01BIBLIOGRAPHY & REVIEW
01-citation-audit
Citation Audit
Inspect reference fields and duplicates, optionally compare DOI metadata with Crossref, and preserve a separate human source review.
OPEN RESEARCH WORKSPACE / SOCIAL LAW × AI GOVERNANCE
Law, with evidence.AI, with accountability.
Exploring how social law can respond to algorithmic management, and how research on large language models can remain traceable, testable, and open to review.
Open research interests · Working tools · Reproducible methods
A SOURCE-CENTERED WORKFLOW
04
Keep the original.
Literature Library
Locate a passage02
Record a review01
Connect the next step03
From reading to an inspectable research record.
01 / BUILDING BLOCKS
Small tools. A connected workflow.
Four practical workspaces for reading, checking, tracing, and planning legal research.
02PASSAGES & EVIDENCE
02-evidence-atlas
Evidence Atlas
Retrieve Chinese and English paragraphs, inspect BM25 scores, and annotate how an exact source passage relates to a claim.
03QUESTIONS & DELIVERABLES
03-research-roadmap
Research Roadmap
Link research questions to reading, experiments, deadlines, and artifacts. Review dependencies and forecast work against real capacity.
04THE READING WORKSPACEStart here
04-literature-library
Literature Library
Keep actual PDF, TXT, and Markdown originals alongside editable records. Browse by journal, author, year, or theme; read papers and export a source-grounded review outline.
These tools organize and check research materials. Source authority, legal effect, and the strength of an argument remain matters for reading and human judgment.
02 / INTERACTIVE STUDIO
A little curiosity. A clearer next step.
Four free, local experiences for exploring AI collaboration, career interests, governance choices and working life. Bring a question; leave with a shareable snapshot.
YOUR AI COLLABORATION STYLE
AI Workstyle
Twenty original situations. Four collaboration axes. Explore how you prompt, check, iterate and set boundaries.
INTERESTS TO EXPLORE
Career Compass
Map six kinds of interests through original activities. Discover career families to investigate and a small experiment to try.
AI DECISIONS, HUMAN CHOICES
Algorithm Jury
Step into fictional AI dilemmas. Choose a response, examine the tradeoff, and explore the governance priorities behind your decisions.
YOUR NEXT CHAPTER
Offer Lab
Compare income, time, growth, autonomy and meaning. Change your priorities and inspect every contribution to the ranking.
Original, transparent explorations—not validated personality diagnoses, hiring predictions, or legal verdicts. No model calls or answer uploads. PNG cards are for voluntary sharing.
03 / QUESTIONS TO PURSUE
Social law meets AI governance.
Open research interests that guide the tools and a developing research agenda.
Workers & algorithmic management
How do automated allocation, monitoring, and evaluation reshape workers’ ability to understand and contest decisions?
Platform labour · Procedural protection · EvidenceSocial protection & access
How should AI-mediated benefit services be assessed for accessibility, unequal burdens, and routes to human assistance?
Social security · Access · Human reviewLLM accountability
What evidence is needed to examine citation reliability, retrieval failures, and the limits of model-assisted legal work?
Source tracing · Evaluation · ReproducibilityThis is a draft agenda: research questions and proposed designs, with findings to be established through future work.
Read the research agenda ↗04 / HOW THE WORK IS BUILT
Make the method inspectable.
A useful research tool should expose its sources, its rules, and its failure cases.
Read the methods note ↗
01
Traceable sources
Keep originals, paragraph positions, bibliographic candidates, and review notes connected.
02
Local-first work
Process research files in the browser. Export backups; optional DOI requests require an explicit choice.
03
Reproducible checks
Publish readable methods, automated checks, and clearly labeled synthetic examples.